// Index — 25 pages

01 Work

02 Writing

03 Me

// Research — n = 100 // captured 2 Oct 2026

What 100 startup homepages get wrong

My studio scored 100 funded AI and SaaS homepages on the 12-question scorecard we use with clients. Here is what we found, and what I'd fix first.

// 01 — Headline numbers

Four numbers that sum it up

  • Average●

    14.1/ 24

    average score across 100 funded AI and SaaS homepages

  • No proof●

    53%

    show no customer logos, testimonials or case studies

  • Clear in 5s●

    21%

    say what the product does in five seconds, on desktop and phone

  • Stage gap●

    +3.1

    points higher at Series A+ than at seed (15.9 vs 12.8)

// 02 — Distribution

Most land in the middle

Scores run from 4 to 19 out of 24. No site reached 20. Thirteen cleared 18, and eight scored under 10.

Number of homepages at each total score from 0 to 24. Peak at 13 with 16 sites; mean 14.1.048121606121824mean 14.1
Total score, 0–24 // Sites per score

// 03 — By stage

Later stage buys proof, not clarity

The gap between seed and Series A+ is credibility and conversion. Clarity barely moves.

  • Seed (YC 2026, n = 60)
  • Series A+ (a16z, n = 40)
Average pillar scores out of 6, seed vs Series A and later.0246Clarity3.43.6Credibility2.64.0Consistency3.74.4Conversion3.24.0
Table view
PillarSeedSeries A+
Clarity3.383.58
Credibility2.604.00
Consistency3.704.40
Conversion3.173.98

// 04 — Findings

What the data says

  1. F-01Finding

    Proof is the biggest gap

    Credibility is the weakest pillar at 3.16 out of 6. Among seed-stage sites, 77% show no customer proof, and more put an investor badge in the first screen (58%) than show any customer proof (23%).

  2. F-02Finding

    Phones lose the message

    35% of desktop first screens say plainly what the product does. On a 390px phone that drops to 21%.

  3. F-03Finding

    Few name a buyer or a difference

    26% name a specific role, team or industry in the first screen, and 22% state a specific difference there.

  4. F-04Finding

    Later stage buys proof, not clarity

    Series A and later sites lead on credibility (4.0 vs 2.6) and conversion (4.0 vs 3.2). Clarity barely moves (3.6 vs 3.4).

  5. F-05Finding

    The product often isn't shown

    42% show product UI, a video or a demo in the first desktop screen; 19% show no product UI anywhere on the homepage.

  6. F-06Finding

    First screens compete with themselves

    45% put three or more buttons in the first desktop screen. Only 27% have one clear primary action at the top and another at the end.

// 05 — My take

What I'd fix first

Four changes, in the order I'd make them.

  • 01Put proof in the first screenA named customer with a number does more than an investor logo. Most seed sites have it backwards.
  • 02Write the headline for a phone firstIf it says what you do at 390px, it says it everywhere.
  • 03Name the buyer and one differenceA role or industry, and a number, an alternative or a mechanism, above the fold.
  • 04Show the productA real screen or a short video beats an abstract illustration.

// 06 — Method

How we scored it

60 seed-stage companies from YC's 2026 batches and 40 Series A+ companies from the a16z portfolio, all AI or SaaS. Each homepage was captured at 1440px and 390px on 2 October 2026 and scored 0 to 2 on twelve criteria across clarity, credibility, consistency and conversion.

No company is named next to a score. The full study has every chart, the method and the aggregate data.

// Work with me

Building something?

We're taking on a few more funded startups at Alterra Studio this quarter. Projects start at $10k.

Book a call hello@ryanhofmann.com